ÇOCUKLARDA EMPATİK EĞİLİM, UMUT VE ÖZ YETERLİĞİN OKULA BAĞLANMAYI YORDAMA DÜZEYLERİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-27
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 6103-6113
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı çocuklarda empatik eğilim, umut ve öz yeterliğin okula bağlanmayı yordama düzeylerinin incelenmesidir. İlişkisel tarama modelinde gerçekleştirilen çalışmanın bağımlı değişkeni okula bağlanma; bağımsız değişkenleri ise empati, umut ve öz yeterlik olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmanın katılımcıları ilkokul 4. sınıfa devam eden 189 öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri Çocuk ve Ergenler İçin Okula Bağlanma Ölçeği, KA-Sİ Empatik Eğilim Ölçeği (Çocuk Formu), Çocuklarda Umut Ölçeği ve Çocuklar İçin Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği ile toplanmış; verilerin analizinde betimleyici istatistikler, Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Katsayısı, Hiyerarşik Regresyon Analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonunda, empatik eğilim, öz yeterlik ve umut değişkenlerinin okula bağlanmayı anlamlı düzeyde yordadığı belirlenmiştir. Buna göre, çocukların empatik eğilimleri, öz yeterlik ve umut düzeyleri arttıkça okula bağlanma, öğretmene bağlanma ve arkadaşa bağlanma düzeyleri artmaktadır. Okul psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik çalışmaları kapsamında çocukların okula bağlanma düzeylerinin artırılmasında, empatik eğilim, umut ve öz yeterlik düzeylerinin geliştirilmesinin yararlı olacağı düşünülmektedir. A

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this study is investigated the predictive levels by the empathic tendency, hope and self-sufficiency of school attachment in children. The dependent variable of the study, ,the relational screening model, was connected to school; and independent variables were determined as empathy, hope and self-efficacy. The participants of the study consisted of 189 students attending elementary school. The data of the research was collected by using the Child Attachment Scale for Child and Adolescents Scale, KA-Sİ Empathic Tendency Scale (Child Form), Hope Scale for Children and Self-Efficacy Scale for Children. At the end of the study, it was determined that the variables of empathic tendency, self-efficacy and hope significantly predicted school attachment with teacher attachment, attachment to friends, and school attachment. According to this, as the empathic tendencies, self-efficacy and hope levels of children increase, the levels of attachment to the school, attachment to the teacher and attachment to the friend increase. In the context of school counseling and guidance, it is thought that improving empathic tendency, hope and self-efficacy levels in increasing children's school attachment levels.

Keywords


  • Akman, Y. & Korkut F. (1993). Umut Ölçeği Üzerine Bir Çalışma. H.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 193-

  • Akman, Y. & Korkut F. (1993). Umut Ölçeği Üzerine Bir Çalışma. H.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 193- 202.

  • Anderman, E.M. (2002). School Effects On Psychological Outcomes During Adolescence. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 94, 795-809.

  • Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., & Furlong, M.J. (2008). Student Engagement With School: CriticalConceptual And Methodological İssues Of The Construct. Psychology İn The Schools, 45(5), 369-386.

  • Ashley, K.E., Ennis, L.E., & Owusu-Ansah, A.N. (2012). An Exploration Of Middle School Students'Perceptions Of Personal Adolescent Wellness And Their Connectedness To School. International Journal Of Social Science And Education. 2, 74-89.

  • Atik, G. & Kemer, G. (2009). Psychometric Properties Of Children’s Hope Scale: Validity And Reliability Study. İlköğretim Online Dergisi. 8(2), 379-390.

  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia Of Human Behavior. NewYork: Academic Press. (Edt. H. Friedman), Encyclopedia Of Mental Health. San Diego: Academic Pres. 4, 71-81.

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise Of Control. New York: Freeman.

  • Barnett, M.A. (1990). Empathy And Related Responses İn Children Empathy And İts Development (Ed: N. Eisenberg, J. Strayer), Cambridge University Press, 147-157, New York.

  • Beishuizzen, J., Hof, E., Van Putten, C., Bouwmeeser, S., & Asscher, J. (2001). Students’ And Teachers’Cognitions About Good Teachers. The British JournalOf Educational Psychology, 71, 185–201. Doi:10.1348/000709901158451.

  • Bergin, C. & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment İn The Classroom. Educ Psychol Rev. 21, 141-170. Doı 10.1007/S10648-009-9104-0.

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment And Healthy Human Development. New York: Basic Books.

  • Burton, K.A., Florell, D., & Wygant, D.B. (2013). The Role Of Peer Attachment And Normative BeliefsAbout Aggression On Traditional Bullying And Cyberbullying. Psychology İn The Schools, 50(2), 103- 115. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1002/Pits.21663

  • Carr, A. (2009). Pozitif Psikoloji. (Çev. C. Devletkuşu). Www.Pdrciyiz.Biz/Pozitif-Psikoloji-T2467.HtmlCatalano, R.F. & Hawkins, J.D. (1996). The Social Development Model: A Theory Of AntisocialBehavior. Chapter 4 In Hawkins J.D. Delinquency And Crime: Current Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Pp 149-197).

  • Catalano, R.F. Haggerty, K.P., Oesterle, S., Fleming, C.B., & Hawkins, J.D. (2004).The İmportance OfBonding To School For Healthy Development: Findings From The Social Development Research Group. J Sch Health. 74(7), 252-61.

  • Corcoran, K.O., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2000). Adult Attachment, Self-Efficacy, Perspective Taking, AndConflict Resolution. Journal Of Counseling & Development, 78, 473-483. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1002/J.1556-6676.2000.Tb01931.X

  • Çetin, B. (2013). Çocuklar İçin Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeğinin İlköğretim 4. Ve 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarısını Yordaması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 21(3). 1117-1132.

  • De Kemp, R., Overbeek, G., De Wied, M., Engels, R., & Scholte, R. (2007). Early Adolescent Empathy, Parental Support, And Antisocial Behavior. Journal Of Genetic Psychology, 168(1), 5-18.

  • Dornbusch, S.M, Erickson,K.G., Laird, J. & Wong, C.A. (2001).The Relation Of Family And SchoolAttachment To Adolescent Deviance İn Diverse Groups And Communities. Journal Of Adolescent Research.16(4), 396-422. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0743558401164006

  • Dökmen, Ü. (2005). İletişim Çatışmaları Ve Empati. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.

  • Eccles, J.S., Early, D., Frasier, K., Belansky, E., & Mccarthy, K. (1997). The Relation Of Connection,Regulation, And Support For Autonomy To Adolescents’ Functioning. Journal Of Adolescent Research, 12, 263-286.

  • Eccles, J.S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, And Goals. Annual Review Of Psychology, 53, 109-132. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1146/Annurev.Psych.53.100901.135153.

  • Edwards, L.M. (2009). Hope. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.). The Encyclopedia Of Positive Psychology (487-491). West Sussex, United Kingdom: Willey-Blackwell.

  • Erikson, E.H. (1982). Childhood And Society. Granada: Triad.

  • Faircloth, B.S. & Hamm, J.V. (2005). Sense Of Belonging Among High School Students Representing Our Ethnic Groups. Journal Of Youth And Adolescence, 34 (4), 293-309.

  • Feshbach, N.D. (1982). Sex Differences İn Empathy. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.). The Development Of Prosocial Behavior. (P. 300- 339). New York: Academic Press.

  • Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School Engagement: Potential Of The Concept, State Of The Evidence. Review Of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.

  • Gilman, R., Dooley, J., & Florell, D. (2006). Relative Levels Of Hope And Their Relationship WithAcademic And Psychological İndicators Among Adolescents. Journal Of Social And Clinical Psychology, 25, 166-178.

  • Hill, L.G., & Werner, N.E. (2006). Affılıatıve Motıvatıon, School Attachment, And Aggressıon İn School. Psychology İn The Schools, 43(2), 231-246.

  • Howes, C. (1999). Attachment Relationships İn The Context Of Multiple Caregivers. In J. Cassidy & P.Shaver (Eds.), Handbook Of Attachment: Theory, Research, And Clinical Applications (Pp. 671-687). New York: Guilford.

  • Ivarsson, T., Broberg, A.G., Arvidsson, T., & Gillberg, C. (2005). Bullying İn Adolescence: PsychiatricProblems İn Victims And Bullies As Measured By The Youth Self Report (Ysr) And Depression Self- Rating Scale (Dsrs). Nordic Journal Of Psychiatry, 59, 365-373. Doı: 10.1080/08039480500227816.

  • Jinks, J. & Morgan, V. (2003). Children’ Percevied Academic Self-Efficacy: An Inventory Scale. Http.//Web6.Epnet.Com/Deliveryprintsave.Asp?Tb=0&-Ug=In+Enus+Sid+Acfa

  • Kaya, A. ve Siyez, D.M. (2010). Ka-Si Çocuk Ve Ergenler İçin Empatik Eğilim Ölçeği: Geliştirilmesi Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Education And Science, 25 (156), 110-125.

  • Kennedy, J.H. & Kennedy, C.E. (2004). Attachment Theory: Implications For School Psychology. Psychol Schools. 41: 247-259, 2004. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Pits.10153

  • Klomek, B.A., Marrocco, F., Kleinman, M., Schonfeld, I.S., & Gould, M.S. (2007). Bullying, Depression,And Suicidality İn Adolescents. Journal Of The American Academy For Child And Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 40-49. Doı: 10.1097/01.Chi.0000242.

  • Kurland, R.M. & Siegel, H.I. (2016). Attachment And Academic Classroom Behavior: Self-Efficacy AndProcrastination As Moderators On The Influence Of Attachment On Academic Success. Psychology. 07(08), 1061-1074.

  • Kwon, S.M. & Oei, T.P.S. (1994). The Roles Of Two Levels Of Cognition İn The Development, Maintenance And Treatment Of Depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 14 (5), 331-358.

  • Linnenbrink, E.A. & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). The Role Of Self Efficacy Beliefs İn Student Engagement AndLearning İn The Classroom. Reading And Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/10573560308223.

  • Lopez, S.J., Snyder, C.R. & Pedrotti, J. T. (2003). Hope: Many Definitions, Many Measures. In S.J. LopezAnd C.R. Snyder (Eds), Positive Psychological Assessment A Handbook Of Models And Measures (91- 106). Washington, Dc: American Psychological Association.

  • Maddox, S.J., & Prinz, R.J. (2003). School Bonding İn Children And Adolescents: Conceptualization, Assessment, And Associated Variables. Clinical Child And Family Psychology Review, 6, 31-49.

  • Marchant, G.J., Paulson, S.E., & Rothlisberg, B.A. (2001). Relations Of Middle School Students’Perceptions Of Family And School Contexts With Academic Achievement. Psychol School. 38, 505-519.

  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J. &, Snyder, C.R. (2000). Relations Between Hope And Graduate Students' Coping Strategies For Studying And Examination-Taking. Psychol Rep. 86(3), 803-806.

  • Pearson, J.L., Cowan, P.A., & Cowan, C.P. (1993). Adult Attachment And Adult Child-Order Parent Relationships. Am J Orthopsychiatry; 4, 606-613.

  • Pfaller, J., Kiselica, M., & Gerstein, L. (1998). Attachment Style And Family Dynamics İn YoungAdults. Journal Of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 353-357. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1037/0022- 0167.45.3.353

  • Resnick, M.D., P.S. Bearman, R.W. Blum, K.E. Bauman, K.M. Harris, J. & Jones Et Al. (1997) ProtectingAdolescents From Harm: Findings From The National Longitudinal Study Of Adolescent Health. Journal Of The American Medical Associa. 278(10), 823-32.

  • Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, Emotional Expressiveness, And Prosocial Behavior. Child Development. 67(2), 449-470.

  • Rogers, C.R. (1983). Empatik Olmak Değeri Anlaşılmamış Bir Varoluş Şeklidir. (Çev. Akkoyun, F.). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 16, 103-124.

  • Savi Çakar, F. (2011). Çocuk Ve Ergenler İçin Okula Bağlanma Ölçeği: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İlköğretim Online, 10(1), 80-90.

  • Savi Çakar, F. & Karataş, Z. (2017). Ergenlerin Okula Bağlanmalarının Yordayıcıları Olarak Benlik Saygısı, Okul Öfkesi Ve Yaşam Doyumu. Eğitim Ve Bilim. 42 (189). 121-136.

  • Savi Çakar, F. (2018). Adolescents’ Resılıence And School Attachment, Emotional And Behavioral

  • Skues, J.L., Cunningham, E.G., & Pokharel, T. (2005). The Influence Of Bullying Behaviours On SenseOf School Connectedness, Motivation And Self-Esteem. Australian Journal Of Guidance And Counselling. 15(1), 17-26.

  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Et.Al., Harney, P.(1991). The Will And The Ways: Development And Validation Of An İndividual-Differences Measure OfHope. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 60(4), 570-585. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1037/0022- 3514.60.4.570

  • Snyder, C.R., Hoza, B., Pelham, W.E., Rapoff ,M., Ware, L., Danovsky, M., Highberger, L., Rubinstein,H., & Stahl, Kj. (1997). The Development And Validation Of The Children’s Hope Scale. Journal Of Pediatric Psychology, 22(3), 399-421.

  • Snyder, C.R., Cheavens, J., & Sympson, S.C. (1997). Hope: An İndividual Motive For Social Commerce. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, And Practice, 1, 107-118.

  • Snyder, C.R., Cheavens, J., & Michael, S.T. (1999). Hoping. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The Psychology Of What Works (Pp. 205-231). New York: Oxford.

  • Snyder, C.R. (2000). Genesis: The Birth And Growth Of Hope. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook Of Hope: Theory, Measures, And Applications (Pp 25-38). San Diago: Academic Press.

  • Snyder, C.R. (2002). Hope Theory: Rainbows İn The Mind. Psychologal Inquiry, 13(4), 249-275.

  • Staats, S. & Stassen, M.A. (1985). Hope: An Affective Cognition. Social Indicators Research, 17, 235-242.Uwah, C.J., Mcmahon, H.G., & Furlow, C.F. (2008). School Belonging, Educational Aspirations, AndAcademic Self-Efficacy Among African American Male High School Students: Implications For School Counselors. Professional School Counseling, 11(5), 296-305.

  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive To Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.

  • Walker, C.O. & Greene, B.A. (2009). The Relations Between Student Motivational Beliefs And Cognitive Engagement İn High School. Journal Of Educational Research, 102(6), 463-472.

  • Wei, M., Russell, D., & Zakalik, R. (2005). Adult Attachment, Social Self-Efficacy, Self-Disclosure,Loneliness, And Subsequent Depression For Freshman College Students: A Longitudinal Study. Journal Of Counseling Psychology. 52, 602-614. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.602

  • Wolters, C.A., & Pintrich, P.R. (1998). Contextual Differences İn Student Motivation And Self-RegulatedLearning İn Mathematics, English, And Social Studies Classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27-47. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_6

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics